Vitalik Buterin Calls Current Prediction Markets Unhealthy – This Is Why

Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin is raising concerns about the current direction of prediction markets, warning that the sector may be drifting toward short-term speculation rather than long-term utility.

In an X post he shared on February 14, Buterin argued that though prediction markets have matured in volume and relevance, they risk becoming overly focused on cryptocurrency price betting, sports wagering, and other high-engagement but low-impact use cases. As he put it:

“My guess is that teams feel motivated to capitulate to these things because they bring in large revenue during a bear market where people are desperate – an understandable motive, but one that leads to corposlop.”

Instead, he believes the next evolution of prediction markets should revolve around real-world risk management and financial infrastructure.

From Information Tools to Speculation Machines?

Buterin acknowledged that prediction markets have achieved real progress. Liquidity is now deep enough to support professional traders, and markets can sometimes provide useful insights that complement traditional media.

However, he warned that the dominant product-market fit today may be unhealthy. Many platforms, he said, are leaning heavily into short-term crypto price bets, sports gambling-style markets, and high-dopamine trading formats. According to Buterin, this shift may be driven partly by bear-market incentives, where platforms prioritize engagement and revenue over long-term societal value.

Structural Problem: Someone Always Loses

Buterin broke prediction markets down into three participant types, including naive traders (participants making poor bets), information buyers (entities paying for market insight), and hedgers (users seeking risk protection).

He argues that today’s ecosystem relies too heavily on the first group, traders making uninformed bets, which can distort incentives and encourage platforms to optimize for speculation rather than utility.

‘Naive traders’: people with dumb opinions who bet on totally wrong things (…) is where we are today. IMO there is nothing fundamentally morally wrong with taking money from people with dumb opinions. But there still is something fundamentally ‘cursed’ about relying on this too much. It gives the platform the incentive to seek out traders with dumb opinions, and create a public brand and community that encourages dumb opinions to get more to come in. This is the slide to corposlop.”

Why Hedging Could Be the Real Future

Buterin believes the most sustainable use case for prediction markets is hedging, which refers to using markets as financial insurance rather than gambling tools.

“My current view is that we should try harder to push them into a totally different use case: hedging, in a very generalized sense (TLDR: we’re gonna replace fiat currency).”

For example, investors exposed to political or macroeconomic risks could use prediction markets to offset downside scenarios. Even if such trades are slightly loss-making in isolation, they may still improve overall financial stability by reducing uncertainty.

In his view, this use case creates a healthier long-term equilibrium where both sides of the market derive real value.

Prediction Markets + AI?

One of Buterin’s more forward-looking ideas involves combining prediction markets with artificial intelligence (AI). He suggested AI systems could analyze individual spending patterns and construct personalized hedging baskets, essentially creating tailored protection against future price shocks.

Such systems could generate decentralized price indices for goods and services, potentially forming the foundation of a new financial architecture. This is how he presented the idea:

“You have price indices on all major categories of goods and services that people buy (treating physical goods/services in different regions as different categories), and prediction markets on each category. Each user (individual or business) has a local LLM that understands that user’s expenses, and offers the user a personalized basket of prediction market shares, representing ‘N days of that user’s expected future expenses.'”

A Challenge to Stablecoins and Fiat Systems

Buterin also floated a more radical implication: prediction markets could eventually compete with traditional currency systems. Instead of relying solely on fiat-pegged stablecoins, users might hold diversified assets like ETH or stocks for growth while using prediction markets to stabilize purchasing power.

In theory, this could create a more decentralized approach to financial stability, one less dependent on fiat-backed instruments.

“We do not need fiat currency at all! People can hold stocks, ETH, or whatever else to grow wealth, and personalized prediction market shares when they want stability.”

What This Means for Crypto Traders

For traders, Buterin’s comments highlight a growing philosophical divide within the crypto industry. On one side are platforms optimizing for engagement and speculative volume, and on the other are builders focused on long-term infrastructure and real-world utility.

If Buterin’s vision gains traction, prediction markets could evolve into hedging tools rather than betting venues, AI-integrated financial primitives, and/or foundations for new decentralized economic systems.

That shift could reshape how traders interact with risk, moving from pure speculation toward portfolio-level risk management.

More Must-Reads:

• Warning: Postal phishing targets Ledger and Trezor users offline
• 21Shares Quietly Upgrades Its Most Critical Infrastructure
• The CFTC Brings Top Crypto CEOs Into Policy Circle