Bitcoin Followed the Script – Then Ripped It Up

Bitcoin (BTC) just delivered an uncomfortable pattern break. After a powerful rebound in 2023 and a broadly bullish 2024, 2025 has so far failed to follow the script, and the numbers are forcing a hard question onto the table: Is the four-year cycle losing its grip on the market?

Data compiled by popular cryptocurrency trading expert CoinsKid and shared in an X post on December 24 shows a sharp contrast. Bitcoin posted strong, broadly consistent gains in 2023 and 2024, aligning with the familiar post-halving recovery narrative.

In 2025, that rhythm broke. Monthly returns turned choppy, downside months dominated, and the year slipped into net negative territory while risk appetite across crypto evaporated almost entirely. This isn’t a single bad quarter, but a structural divergence from what cycle traders were positioned for.

What the 2025 Breakdown Actually Tells Us

The first uncomfortable truth is that 2025 wasn’t just ‘bad for Bitcoin.’ It was bearish across roughly 99% of crypto assets.

Altcoins underperformed sharply, speculative liquidity dried up, and reflexive leverage never returned after early-year drawdowns. Bitcoin has held relative strength, but relative strength is not the same as upside.

That distinction matters. Bitcoin no longer trades in isolation. It now sits inside a macro-driven, institutionally surveilled market structure where exchange-traded funds (ETFs), custody flows, and risk-off capital controls blunt the explosive reflexivity that once defined post-halving years.

In earlier cycles, Bitcoin needed marginal buyers. In 2025, it needs sustained balance-sheet commitment, and that has proven slower, more selective, and far less emotional.

For the time being, BTC is trading at $87,427.76, up 0.75% on the day, gaining 0.49% across the week, and advancing 0.77% on its monthly chart, according to the most recent pricing information.

Is This Market Maturity or Something Breaking?

The deeper signal isn’t that Bitcoin failed to rally. It’s that expectations failed. The four-year cycle thesis relies on synchronized behavior: miners adjusting supply, retail chasing momentum, and speculative capital amplifying the trend. In 2025, those feedback loops didn’t fully activate.

That doesn’t mean cycles are ‘dead.’ It suggests they are being diluted by scale, regulation, and institutional discipline. Bitcoin may still move in long arcs, but not with the clean, calendar-driven symmetry traders once relied on.

If anything, 2025 may mark Bitcoin’s transition from a cyclical trade to a macro asset with uneven, policy-sensitive volatility. For investors, that’s not bearish by default, but it does mean old playbooks deserve less blind trust than they once did.

More Must-Reads:

• Dogecoin Walked Into the Cloud — and Fell Through It
• Billions On The Line As ETH Hits Its Max Pain Level
• Is XRP The Most Mispriced Token In Crypto?