A major BTC holder moved $351M into Binance, raising speculation as on‑chain data confirms the transfer, but not the whale’s motive.
$340M in Bitcoin Hits Binance as the Hyperunit Whale De-Risks Hard
In Brief
- • The Hyperunit whale moved roughly $340M in BTC to Binance.
- • The transfer likely signals selling or collateral repositioning.
- • The activity points to deleveraging, not accumulation.
A large Bitcoin holder that on-chain analysts often label the “Hyperunit whale” moved about 5,000 BTC to Binance in a short window.
That transfer equated to roughly $351 million at the time of reporting, and it likely signaled intent to sell.
However, you should separate what we can prove from what people assume. The blockchain can show a transfer into an exchange-linked cluster.
Even so, the chain cannot reveal a motive, or a real-world identity.
Identity Claims Stay Unproven, Yet They Still Move Narratives
Crypto Twitter has tied the “Hyperunit whale” label to Garrett Jin. A former BitForex CEO, through address clustering and behavioral patterns. Still, that linkage remains a claim from analysts, not a verified identity record.
Moreover, the same coverage notes that Jin has denied personal ownership of the funds in prior commentary. While describing a role that involves managing client assets.
That distinction matters because identity claims can distort the story fast.
So, treat “linked to Garrett Jin” as an attribution hypothesis, not a confirmed fact. Meanwhile, focus on the measurable event: a large BTC inflow into Binance-linked infrastructure.
Why a Binance Deposit Often Implies Selling Pressure
Next, let’s talk mechanics. When a whale sends BTC to Binance, they usually prepare for one of three actions. They sell spot BTC. They post BTC as collateral. Or they reposition for derivatives.
In this case, the context points toward de-risking. The same reporting links the entity to a recent large loss event on Hyperliquid.
Therefore, the Binance deposit can function as liquidity, which supports margin, hedging, or cash-outs.
Also, exchange inflows matter because they change market microstructure. Binance can internalize flows via its order book. As a result, large deposits can precede higher realized volatility, especially during thin bids.
The Bigger Signal: Deleveraging Beats “Whale Watching”
Finally, this story looks less like a celebrity wallet saga. It looks more like a deleveraging cycle. Reports describe prior peak holdings in the billions, and then a sharp drawdown in on-chain balances.
That pattern usually follows the same sequence. First, leverage magnifies PnL. Next, price moves force collateral shuffles. Then, traders sell liquid assets, often BTC, to plug gaps elsewhere.
So, the key takeaway isn’t the name attached to the wallet. The real takeaway is flow direction. When large players convert BTC into exchange liquidity, they often prioritize survival over upside.
More Must-Reads:
Crypto Market Cycles: What Actually Changes Between Each Phase
How Crypto Market Makers Really Operate in 2026
Crypto Firms Are Offering Banks a Deal to Save a Key US Bill
How do you rate this article?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel for crypto market insights and educational videos.
Join our Socials
Briefly, clearly and without noise – get the most important crypto news and market insights first.
Also read
Similar stories you might like.